Either weвЂ™re almost definitely a simulation, or these simulations just donвЂ™t happen. And if the did run these things, then the chances that weвЂ™re a simulation, instead of a race that will eventually run simulations, is literally millions-to-one. In fact, they could run millions of these things. They could, if they wanted to, run simulations of human evolution, right down to the very thoughts of each simulated person. So letвЂ™s say these bros have that level of technology. Imagine the shit weвЂ™ll have in a couple centuries - crazy fast computing. ThatвЂ™s not hard to imagine - youвЂ™re likely reading this on a computer that is thousands of times more powerful than the very first supercomputers, built only decades ago, and they stored those fuckers in entire rooms. LetвЂ™s say thereвЂ™s this race of superbros who are technologically way the fuck ahead of us. At face value, itвЂ™s easy to see how one of those has to be true. WeвЂ™ll probably go extinct before we evolve past humanity, to what the original author calls вЂњposthumanityвЂќ, (2) If we do achieve posthumanity, we wonвЂ™t really care enough to run tons of simulations of our ancestors, or (3) We are living in a simulation. Those three propositions are, in a nutshell: (1). The simulation argument falls into the category of Cartesian Mindfucks, the sort of arguments that ask, вЂњIs the universe really, truly the way we perceive it to be or are we somehow being deceived?вЂќ This particular argument proceeds by presenting three different propositions, at least one of which is probably true. Zepfan5150 writes, Hey Philosophy Bro,IвЂ™ve been hearing a lot recently on the simulation argument.any chance you wanna try and tackle it? YouвЂ™ve explained everything else it seems like. Send your questions to with вЂMailbag MondayвЂ™ in the subject line. Mailbag Monday: A weekly segment that covers readersвЂ™ questions and concerns about all things Philosophy, Bro, and Philosophy Bro that donвЂ™t quite fit anywhere else.

Sims 3 sentience chip